Shallow outline
Claim: what matters most sits at the top of a document's hierarchy, and the outline stays shallow: at most three levels of headings.
- Grade: measured for recall of top-level ideas; the three-level limit is a convention.
- Evidence: psycholinguistics (strand 5), against.
- Check:
outline-depth(exact count; warns past level 3); whether the top levels carry the main claims is judgment. - Reader styles: none override it.
What it asks
- The main claims are top-level: headings or the first sentence of each part. Detail sits below them.
- Three heading levels at most. A fourth level is a sign that the part is a document of its own.
- Headings that name their content, so the outline alone gives the gist (signal the structure).
Why
- Idea units high in a text's content structure are recalled better than low ones, the levels effect (Meyer & McConkie 1973; Meyer 1975, secondary). Read first-hand: superordinate propositions were recalled better than subordinate ones, 86% against 74% (Kintsch 1973).
- Readers slow down more at a changed word high in the hierarchy than low in it (Wu et al. 2016).
- Readers who follow the top-level structure comprehend better (Meyer et al. 1980), and adults who attend to headings write the best summaries (Hyönä et al. 2002).
- The tree of a text can be made explicit: Rhetorical Structure Theory describes it as nucleus and satellite spans (Mann & Thompson 1988).
Limits
The levels effect depends on the reader's skill (Meyer et al. 1980). The three-level limit is not measured; it follows from the effect and from browsable folders.