Sources of llm readers: scored

Every work the llm-readers folder cites: papers by kind, preprints and vendor pages scored. Method: multivocal-protocol.md.

Preprints are tier 2. Only the abstract page of each preprint loaded, so unseen sections score 0.

Grey sources, scored

Key	Kind	Quality	Used in
Hong 2025	company technical report, tier 2	A3 M6 O1.5 D1 P1 N1.5 I1 T0.5 = 15.5	against.md, frame.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Vercel 2026	company blog, vendor evaluation, tier 2	A3.5 M5.5 O1.5 D1 P1 N1 I0.5 T0.5 = 14.5	against.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Ahrefs 2026	company blog, log study, tier 2	A2.5 M6 O1.5 D1 P1 N1 I0.5 T0.5 = 14	position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Howard 2024	proposal site (llmstxt.org), tier 2	A3 M5 O1 D1 P1 N1 I1 T0.5 = 13.5	baseline.md, review.md
OpenAI 2025	company cookbook (archived), tier 2	A3.5 M5.5 O1.5 D0 P1 N1 I0.5 T0.5 = 13.5	against.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Anthropic 2026b	product documentation, tier 2	A4 M4.5 O1.5 D0 P1 N0.5 I0.5 T0.5 = 12.5	against.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
McMillan 2026	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A1.5 M5 O3 D1 P0 N1.5 I0 T0.5 = 12.5	against.md, baseline.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Zhou 2023a	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A2 M4.5 O2 D1 P0.5 N1.5 I0.5 T0.5 = 12.5	frame.md, review.md
Ahsan 2026	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A2 M4.5 O2 D1 P0.5 N1.5 I0 T0.5 = 12	position.md, review.md
Lee 2026	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A2 M4.5 O2 D1 P0.5 N1.5 I0 T0.5 = 12	against.md, frame.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Mei 2025	preprint survey (abstract page read), tier 2	A2 M4 O2 D1 P1 N1.5 I0 T0.5 = 12	frame.md, review.md
Gloaguen 2026	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A2 M4 O2 D1 P0 N2 I0 T0.5 = 11.5	against.md, baseline.md, frame.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
He 2024	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A2 M4.5 O2 D1 P0.5 N1 I0 T0.5 = 11.5	against.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Khatri 2026	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A1.5 M4.5 O2 D1 P0.5 N1.5 I0 T0.5 = 11.5	against.md, baseline.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
OpenAI 2026a	product documentation, tier 2	A3.5 M5 O1 D0 P1 N0.5 I0 T0.5 = 11.5	against.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Jaroslawicz 2025	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A1.5 M4 O2 D1 P0.5 N1.5 I0 T0.5 = 11	against.md, frame.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Lulla 2026	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A2 M4.5 O2 D1 P0 N1 I0 T0.5 = 11	against.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Zarzycki 2026	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A1.5 M5 O2 D1 P0 N1 I0 T0.5 = 11	against.md, review.md
Chatlatanagulchai 2026	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A2 M4 O2 D1 P0 N1 I0 T0.5 = 10.5	review.md
Liu 2025	preprint survey (abstract page read), tier 2	A2 M3 O2 D1 P1 N1 I0 T0.5 = 10.5	review.md
Treude 2026	preprint, position paper (abstract page read), tier 2	A2 M3.5 O2 D1 P0.5 N1 I0 T0.5 = 10.5	against.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Volpini 2026	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A1.5 M4.5 O1.5 D1 P0 N1.5 I0 T0.5 = 10.5	position.md
Anthropic 2026a	company guide, tier 2	A4 M3 O0.5 D0 P1 N0.5 I0.5 T0.5 = 10	against.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Agentic AI Foundation 2026	project site (agents.md), tier 2	A3 M3.5 O0 D0 P1 N0.5 I1 T0.5 = 9.5	review.md
Leviathan 2025	preprint (abstract page read), tier 2	A2 M2 O1.5 D1 P0 N1 I0 T0.5 = 8	against.md, position.md, review.md

Formal sources

Key	Kind	Used in
Chen 2024a	experiment	review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Chen 2024b	experiment	position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Cuconasu 2024	experiment	against.md, review.md
Gong 2024	experiment	against.md
Gou 2024	experiment	review.md
Hsieh 2024a	benchmark	against.md, frame.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Hsieh 2024b	experiment	review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Huang 2024	experiment	against.md, baseline.md, frame.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Jiang 2023	experiment	frame.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Jiang 2025	empirical study (accepted at a conference per arXiv comments)	review.md
Kamoi 2024	survey	against.md, frame.md, position.md, review.md
Kobak 2025	corpus study	against.md, frame.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Kumar 2025	experiment	against.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Levy 2024	experiment	against.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Liang 2023	experiment	against.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Liang 2024	corpus study	against.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Liu 2024	experiment	against.md, baseline.md, frame.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Modarressi 2025	benchmark	against.md, baseline.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Olausson 2024	experiment	review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Panickssery 2024	experiment	baseline.md, review.md
Reinhart 2025	corpus study	review.md
Sadasivan 2023	experiment	against.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Sclar 2024	experiment	against.md, baseline.md, frame.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Shi 2023	experiment	against.md, frame.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Sui 2024	benchmark	position.md, review.md
Tam 2024	experiment	frame.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Veseli 2025	experiment	against.md, position.md, review.md
Wu 2025	survey	frame.md, review.md
Xu 2024a	experiment	against.md, position.md, review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Xu 2024b	survey	frame.md, position.md, review.md
Yoran 2024	experiment	review.md, state-of-the-art.md
Zhou 2023b	experiment	review.md
dos Santos 2026	empirical study (venue per bibliography, not fetched)	position.md, review.md