Sources of reading-order

This file lists every source cited in evidence/reading-order/; the scoring follows the protocol.

Grey sources, scored

Key Kind Quality Used in
Morkes 1997 company page (NN/g) A4 M5.5 O1.5 D1 P0.5 N1 I1 T0.5 = 15 review
Nielsen 2006 company page (NN/g) A4 M4.5 O1.5 D1 P1 N1 I1 T0.5 = 14.5 position, review, state-of-the-art
ISO 2023 standard A4 M3.5 O2 D1 P0.5 N0.5 I1 T1 = 13.5 (preview of 11 pages read; clauses 5.2.4 to 5.4 and annexes not read) frame, position, review
Nildam 1998 thesis (abstract read) A2 M3.5 O2.5 D1 P0 N1 I0 T1 = 11 against, position, review, state-of-the-art
Sternadori 2008 thesis A2.5 M5 O4 D1 P0 N2 I0 T1 = 15.5 (full text, read in the open-access repository on 2026-10-29; parts not seen score 0) against, position, review, state-of-the-art
Kenny 1993 ERIC report D1 T1 = 2 (not read: scanned PDF, no text) review

Formal sources

Key Kind Used in
Amadieu 2009 experiment against, review
Ariel 2009 experiment review
Ashman 2020 experiment against, review
Bransford 1972 experiment review, state-of-the-art
Brunmair 2019 meta-analysis review, state-of-the-art
Carvalho 2014 experiment review
Chen 2006 review review
Costa 2022 meta-analysis review, state-of-the-art
Dee-Lucas 1995, 1999 experiment review
DeStefano 2007 review against, review
Doignon 1985 theory review
Duggan 2009 experiment review
Duggan 2011 experiment frame, review
Dunlosky 2012 experiment review, state-of-the-art
Fuller 2014 experiment against, review
Fyfe 2014 review against, review
Gagné 1968 theory frame, review
van Gog 2011 experiment review, state-of-the-art
Harden 1999 review against, frame, review
Hartley 2004 review review, state-of-the-art
St. Hilaire 2023 meta-analysis review, state-of-the-art
Hodds 2014 experiment review, state-of-the-art
Jansen 2010 experiment against, position, review, state-of-the-art
Jáñez 2016 experiment review
Kalyuga 2004 experiment review
Kester 2001, 2004 experiment against, review
Klauer 1984 meta-analysis against, review, state-of-the-art
Lawless 1996 review review
Leron 1983 theory review
Loibl 2017 review against, review
Luiten 1980 meta-analysis against, frame, review, state-of-the-art
Mayer 1979 review against, frame, review, state-of-the-art
McCrudden 2005 experiment against, review, state-of-the-art
McCrudden 2007 review frame, review
McDaniel 2009 experiment against, review
McNeil 2012 experiment review
Metcalfe 2005 experiment against, frame, review
Nelson 1988 experiment against, review
Pirolli 1999 theory frame, review
Ponce 2023 meta-analysis frame, review
Ponce 2025 meta-analysis review, state-of-the-art
Pyc 2009 experiment review
Rawson 2011 experiment against, review, state-of-the-art
Rayner 2016 review against, review, state-of-the-art
Reigeluth 1983 theory frame, review
Rittle-Johnson 2009 experiment review
Rittle-Johnson 2015 review review, state-of-the-art
Rohrer 2020 experiment review
Rozenblit 2002 experiment review, state-of-the-art
Salmerón 2005, 2006 experiment frame, review, state-of-the-art
Schwartz 2009 survey against, position, review
Sinha 2021 meta-analysis against, review
Stone 1983 meta-analysis against, review, state-of-the-art
Swanson 1993 theory review
Tetzlaff 2025 meta-analysis against, review, state-of-the-art
Van Patten 1986 review against, frame, review
Weber 2015 experiment review
White 1973 review against, review
Wickens 2013 meta-analysis review, state-of-the-art
Yan 2017 experiment review