Learning science for notes and documents
How should text be structured so a reader learns and retains more? The field calls this instructional design, grounded in cognitive load theory and multimedia learning.
Steps: frame · review · state of the art · position · against · baseline · bibliography
Claims
| Claim | Grade | Where |
|---|---|---|
| Practice testing beats restudy (g = 0.33; 0.50 against all controls) | measured | review.md 2 |
| Spaced beats massed retrieval (g = 0.74) | measured | review.md 2 |
| Worked examples help novices, reverse for experts | measured | review.md 3 |
| Constructing a concept map beats studying one (g = 0.72) | measured | review.md 4 |
| Words placed with their picture beat split placement (d about 0.72 to 0.85, secondary) | measured | review.md 5 |
| Signalling helps retention (g = 0.53) | measured | review.md 5 |
| Each hypertext link adds load for novices | supported with caveat | review.md 6 |
| Matching instruction to a learning style helps | not supported | against.md |
| Skeletal notes raise recall | supported with caveat | review.md 4 |
| Section length thresholds (e.g. 80 lines) | convention, untested | position.md |