Handoff
Works met in this search that belong to another topic, one line each: key or record, why, which topic. Not reviewed here.
To the sibling reviews
| Work | Why | Topic |
|---|---|---|
| Upahi (2016), ERIC EJ1107768; Davila (2010), EJ913066; Marshall (2008), EJ1052567; Metzgar (2023), EJ1401088 | levels of end-of-chapter questions in textbooks, classified by Bloom's taxonomy | practice-questions |
| Academia SE question 110973 (2018) | a sample test given as a study guide: practice exams against new items | practice-questions |
| The Carpentries lesson training, episode "misconceptions-mcqs" | multiple-choice questions whose distractors diagnose misconceptions | practice-questions |
| Golding 2012 (EJ1004935) | flashcards in an introductory psychology class, met under study guides (F15) | flashcards |
| "Improving students' self-evaluation of learning for key concepts in textbook materials" (2007; Semantic Scholar, F25) | self-testing on key-term definitions from a textbook | flashcards |
| Mathematics Educators SE questions 86, 351, 13404, 23292 | publishing homework and exam solutions; studies of sheets with and without worked solutions | exercise-sets (already held there as MathEd 2014b, 2014c, 2017a, 2021b) |
| Mathematics Educators SE question 13763; Academia SE question 105054 | whether answer keys are bad, per education research | exercise-sets |
| Mathematics Educators SE question 27964 | choosing a textbook by the difficulty of its problems | exercise-sets |
| Rystrom 2005 | access to end-of-chapter solutions; linked here from review.md strand 7 | exercise-sets (held there) |
Keys chosen here that the merge must check
- MathEd 2014h to 2014l, MathEd 2017b and 2017c, Academia 2014a, 2017b, 2017c, 2018b, 2018c, 2022a, CSEd 2018c, OpenStax 2026b and 2026c, Jin 2025b, Dickson 2005b. They were chosen after the exercise-sets references and the five bibliographies on 2026-10-29. The other two siblings had no references file yet.
A fix for the core (reader-ergonomics bibliography)
- The row
Dickson 2005gives the title "Effectiveness of crib sheets (index cards)" and the DOI 10.1207/s15328023top3204_4. - On Crossref (2026-10-29) that DOI resolves to a call for nominations for the journal's editor, in the same issue.
- The paper is Dickson, Miller (2005), "Authorized crib cards do not improve exam performance", Teaching of Psychology 32(4), 230-233, DOI 10.1207/s15328023top3204_6.
- The key stays. Corrected in reader-ergonomics v1.3.1 (2026-10-29), after its maintainer checked both DOIs on Crossref.