Sources

This file lists every source in the pool of this review: the search flow, what was excluded, and one scored row per source; how it was built is in protocol.

Flow

Stage Formal Grey
Returned by the strings 83 182
Screened not recorded not recorded
Included as new 11 12
Carried from the earlier pass 101 23
Cited without being read 3 0
In the review 115 35
  • Formal:
    • The 83 results are those of the nine searches for existing reviews (E1 to E8 and the Blanco 2019 lookup).
    • The formal pool was built by narrative search and snowballing.
    • 11 formal sources were added with a source that was read, plus 3 pointers (Macleod 2021, Nosek 2015, Grant 2024) cited without being read; the pointers are in the 115.
    • The earlier pool held 101 formal sources.
  • Grey:
    • The 182 results are those of the 17 grey strings.
    • 12 grey sources were added, and the earlier pool held 23.
    • A screened count is not recorded; the table by string below gives the number read: 22 in all, in full or as an abstract.

In the review: the academic papers source rows of each kind, counted by script.

The figure draws the stages of the table for academic papers.

83 formal and 182 grey results were returned. 11 formal sources and 12 grey sources were added, 101 formal and 23 grey were carried, and 3 formal were cited without being read, for 115 formal and 35 grey sources in the review, 150 in all.

By string

Found is the number of results the search listed; read is the number fetched and read, in full or as an abstract; added is the number new to the review.

String Found Read Added
E1 IMRaD review 9 0 0
E2 reporting-guideline endorsement 9 1 1
E3 graphical and visual abstracts 10 1 1
E4 plain language summaries 9 1 2
E5 structured abstracts 9 0 0
E6 ML checklists 9 1 1
E7 AI policy audits 9 1 1
E8 writing-training reviews 9 1 1
Lookup: Blanco 2019 10 1 1
G1 graphical abstract guides 10 1 1
G2 plain language summary instructions 9 1 1
G3 data availability policies 10 0 0
G4 TOP guidelines 10 1 1 (+2 pointers)
G5 MDAR 10 1 1 (+1 pointer)
G6 COPE 10 0 0
G7 ICLR policy 9 1 1
G8 ICML policy 10 3 3
G9 arXiv policy 9 1 1
G10 IMRaD writing advice 10 1 1
G11 AI companies publishing 9 1 1
G12 RRID at AACR 19 1 1
G13 key resources table 10 1 1
G14 Springer Nature AI policy 10 0 0
G15 EQUATOR AI extensions 19 1 1
G16 ACM badging 9 0 0
G17 PLOS author summary 9 1 1
Total 265 (83 on existing reviews, 182 grey) 22 23 (+3 pointers)

Totals by kind: 12 grey sources and 11 formal sources added with a read source, plus 3 formal pointers (Macleod 2021, Nosek 2015, Grant 2024) cited without being read. The earlier pool of 101 formal and 23 grey sources was built before this pass by narrative search and snowballing; its rows below carry no string id.

Excluded

Reason (protocol.md 7) Examples Count
EC1 relay or secondary news on arXiv's rule and on AI start-ups; library guides on data statements; editing-service blogs on graphical abstracts not counted one by one
EC3 not retrievable COPE statement on AI authorship (G6); Springer Nature AI policy (G14); ACM badging policy (G16); a news article on AI start-ups (G11) 4
EC4 duplicate the ICML policy covered again by news; the Bhavsar audit found by three strings not counted
EC5 peer-review process only ICLR and ICML reviewer rules beyond what changes authors' work not counted
  • The numbers from Gainey 2022 were read in the abstract, a primary source.
  • The Galipeau 2015 abstract was seen, not its results.

Pool

The quality column holds the evidence grade for a formal source. For a grey source it holds the score out of 20 with the eight subtotals A to T defined in the method.

Of 35 grey sources, 6 score below 10: Elsevier highlights (9), eLife 2020 (9.5), Octopus (7.5), Elsevier GA 2026 (9), Elsevier KRT 2026 (9.5), GMU 2026 (7.5). Each is marked in review.md and in the file that leans on it as an example of practice only; none supports a claim.

Key Kind Found via Quality Used in
Ad Hoc Working Group 1987 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review, frame
Ahmed 2023 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review
Ashurst 2022 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, against
Atkinson 1999 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, against
Babic 2019 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, position
Bazerman 1988 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, against
Bommasani 2023 formal narrative search and snowballing measured, descriptive review
Bommasani 2024 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, state-of-the-art, against
Booth 1997 formal narrative search and snowballing measured state-of-the-art, against
Boutron 2010 formal narrative search and snowballing measured against
Boyd 2021 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, state-of-the-art, position, against
Bredbenner 2019 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, against, baseline
Buckheit 1995 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review
Budgen 2008 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, baseline
Buljan 2018 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against, baseline
Chambers 2013 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review, baseline
Chambers 2022 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review
Chapman 2019 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, against
Collberg 2016 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, against
Danchev 2021 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against, baseline
Dodge 2019 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review
Findley 2016 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, against
Frankston 2024 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review
Gabelica 2022 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against, baseline
Ganjavi 2024 formal narrative search and snowballing measured, descriptive review, state-of-the-art, position
Gebru 2021 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review
Gnewuch 2025 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, against
Goldberg 2024 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review
Gopen 1990 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review
Gross 2002 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review
Groth 2010 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review, against
Gundersen 2018 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review
Hamilton 2023 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, position, against
Hardwicke 2018 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against
Hartley 1996 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat state-of-the-art, baseline
Hartley 1997 formal narrative search and snowballing measured state-of-the-art, against
Hartley 1999 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review
Hartley 2000 formal narrative search and snowballing measured state-of-the-art, against, baseline
Hartley 2003 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, position
Hartley 2004 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against, baseline
Hartley 2014 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, against, baseline
Haynes 1990 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review
Hermann 2020 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, against
Heumüller 2020 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against
Hill 1982 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, frame
Hillier 2016 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review
Hopewell 2008 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review, baseline
Hopewell 2025 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review
Howitt 2014 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat against
Hubbard 2017 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, state-of-the-art, position, baseline
Hyland 2004 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, frame
Ibrahim 2017 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, against
Jelicic Kadic 2016 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, against
Kapoor 2023 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, against
Karačić 2019 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, against
Kerr 1998 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat against, frame
Kidwell 2016 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position
Kim 2022 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, position
Kobak 2025 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against, baseline
Liang 2024b formal narrative search and snowballing measured, descriptive review, state-of-the-art, position, against
Liang 2025 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against
Lin 2012 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against
Magnusson 2023 formal narrative search and snowballing measured, descriptive review, state-of-the-art, position, against
Markowitz 2024 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against
Mensh 2017 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review, against
Mitchell 2019 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review
Moskovitz 2024 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against, baseline
Nanayakkara 2021 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, against
Nicholas 2007 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review
Nosek 2014 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review
Oska 2020 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, baseline
Page 2021 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review
Pferschy-Wenzig 2016 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, position, against
Pimentel 2019 formal narrative search and snowballing measured state-of-the-art, position, against
Pineau 2021 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review, state-of-the-art, position, against, baseline
Pitkin 1999 formal narrative search and snowballing measured state-of-the-art, against, baseline
Plavén-Sigray 2017 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, against, baseline
Renear 2009 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, frame
Rogers 2021 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review
Saucez 2019 formal narrative search and snowballing measured, descriptive review
Scheel 2021 formal narrative search and snowballing measured state-of-the-art, position, against
Schulz 2010 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review
Sharma 2006 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, baseline
Simera 2010 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review
Soderberg 2021 formal narrative search and snowballing measured state-of-the-art, position
Sollaci 2004 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, baseline
Stodden 2018 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against
Swales 1990 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, frame
Swales 2004 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, position
Swales 2012 formal narrative search and snowballing convention, untested review
Sword 2012 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, against
Taddio 1994 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, baseline
Tenopir 2008 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, state-of-the-art, position
Tenopir 2015 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review
Timperley 2021 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, against
Turner 2012 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, baseline
Vasilevsky 2013 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, position
Wang 2024 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review
Weinberger 2015 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, against
Winter 2022 formal narrative search and snowballing measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against, baseline
Yang 2016 formal narrative search and snowballing supported with caveat review, position
Stevens 2014 formal (added) E2 measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against, baseline
Blanco 2019 formal (added) lookup after E2 measured, descriptive review, position, against, frame
Galipeau 2015 formal (added) E8 supported with caveat review, frame
Stoll 2022 formal (added) E4 measured review, state-of-the-art, position, against, baseline
Gainey 2022 formal (added) E4 measured, descriptive review, state-of-the-art
Krukowski 2023 formal (added) E3 supported with caveat review, position
Bhavsar 2025 formal (added) E7 measured, descriptive review, state-of-the-art, position
Liu 2020 formal (added) G15 convention, untested review
Macleod 2021 formal (added) G5 (pointer, not read) convention, untested review
Nosek 2015 formal (added) G4 (pointer, not read) convention, untested review
Grant 2024 formal (added) G4 (pointer, not read) convention, untested review
Coakley 2026 formal (added) E6 supported with caveat review, state-of-the-art, position, against
Kim 2026 formal (added) G8 supported with caveat review, state-of-the-art, position, against
Loisel 2026 formal (added) G11 supported with caveat review, state-of-the-art
ICMJE 2026 grey tier 1 narrative search A4 M3 O1.5 D0.5 P0.5 N1 I1 T1 = 12.5/20; scored from the entry in review.md review, position, against, baseline
ICMJE 2023 grey tier 1 narrative search A4 M3 O1.5 D0.5 P0.5 N1 I1 T1 = 12.5/20 review, position
Gastel 2016 grey tier 1 narrative search A4 M4 O3 D1 P1 N0.5 I1 T1 = 15.5/20 review
Elsevier highlights grey tier 2 narrative search A3.5 M2.5 O1 D0 P0 N0.5 I1 T0.5 = 9/20 (below 10: example of practice only); scored from the entry in review.md review, against, frame
Marcus 2016 grey tier 1 narrative search A4 M3 O1 D1 P0.5 N1 I1 T1 = 12.5/20 review
eLife 2017 grey tier 2 narrative search A3.5 M4.5 O1 D1 P0.5 N1 I0.5 T0.5 = 12.5/20 review, against
eLife 2020 grey tier 2 narrative search A3.5 M2 O1 D1 P0 N1 I0.5 T0.5 = 9.5/20 (below 10: example of practice only) review, position
Octopus grey tier 2 narrative search A3 M2 O1 D0 P0 N0.5 I0.5 T0.5 = 7.5/20 (below 10: example of practice only); scored from the entry in review.md review
Olah 2017 grey tier 1 narrative search A3.5 M2 O2 D1 P0.5 N1 I1 T1 = 12/20 review
Distill 2021 grey tier 2 narrative search A3.5 M2 O2 D1 P0.5 N0.5 I0.5 T0.5 = 10.5/20 against
Nature 2023 grey tier 1 narrative search A4 M2.5 O1.5 D1 P0.5 N1 I1 T1 = 12.5/20 review, position
ACL 2023 grey tier 2 narrative search A3.5 M3 O1.5 D1 P0.5 N1 I1 T0.5 = 12/20 review, position, baseline
ICML 2023 grey tier 2 narrative search A3.5 M2.5 O1.5 D0.5 P0.5 N1 I1 T0.5 = 11/20 review, position
NeurIPS 2021 grey tier 2 narrative search A3.5 M3 O1.5 D0.5 P0.5 N1 I1 T0.5 = 11.5/20 review
NeurIPS 2025 grey tier 2 narrative search A3.5 M3 O1.5 D0 P0.5 N1 I1 T0.5 = 11/20; undated review, position
NeurIPS 2026 grey tier 2 narrative search A3.5 M3 O1.5 D0.5 P0.5 N1 I1 T0.5 = 11.5/20; page replaced each year review, state-of-the-art, baseline
OpenAI 2023 grey tier 1 narrative search A4 M4.5 O1 D1 P0.5 N1 I1 T1 = 14/20; owner's account review, against
Rodriguez 2021 grey tier 1 narrative search A3.5 M3 O2 D1 P0.5 N0.5 I0.5 T1 = 12/20 review, against
Pinker 2014 grey tier 1 narrative search A4 M2.5 O2 D1 P0.5 N1 I1 T1 = 13/20 review
Keshav 2007 grey tier 1 narrative search A4 M2 O2 D1 P0.5 N1 I1 T1 = 12.5/20 review, against
Medawar 1963 grey tier 1 narrative search A4 M2 O1.5 D1 P0 N1 I1 T1 = 11.5/20; essay in a magazine against
CTAN class documentation (elsarticle, llncs, IEEEtran, acmart) grey tier 2 narrative search A3.5 M2 O2 D0.5 P0 N0.5 I1 T0.5 = 10/20; scored as one group, from the entries in review.md review
JATS grey tier 1 narrative search A4 M3 O2 D1 P0.5 N1 I1 T1 = 13.5/20; scored from the entry in review.md review, frame
Elsevier GA 2026 grey tier 2 (added) G1 A3.5 M2.5 O1 D0 P0 N0.5 I1 T0.5 = 9/20 (below 10: example of practice only); undated review, against
Elsevier KRT 2026 grey tier 2 (added) G13 A3.5 M2.5 O0.5 D0 P0.5 N1 I1 T0.5 = 9.5/20 (below 10: example of practice only); undated; claims without data review, position, against
Taylor 2024 (Taylor & Francis) grey tier 1 (added) G2 A3.5 M3 O1 D1 P0.5 N1 I0.5 T1 = 11.5/20 review, position, baseline
PLOS 2026 grey tier 2 (added) G17 A3.5 M3 O1.5 D0 P0 N0.5 I1 T0.5 = 10/20; undated review, position, baseline
ICLR 2025 grey tier 2 (added) G7 A3.5 M3.5 O1.5 D1 P1 N1 I1 T0.5 = 13/20 review, position
ICML 2026a grey tier 2 (added) G8 A3.5 M3 O1.5 D0 P0.5 N1 I1 T0.5 = 11/20; undated review
ICML 2026b grey tier 2 (added) G8 A3.5 M4.5 O1.5 D1 P1 N1.5 I1 T0.5 = 14.5/20; owner's account review, state-of-the-art, position, against
arXiv 2025 grey tier 2 (added) G9 A3.5 M3.5 O1.5 D1 P0.5 N1 I1 T0.5 = 12.5/20 review, position
COS 2024 grey tier 2 (added) G4 A3.5 M3 O1.5 D1 P0.5 N1 I1 T0.5 = 12/20; owner's account review
COS 2019 grey tier 2 (added) G5 A3.5 M3.5 O1 D1 P0.5 N1 I0.5 T0.5 = 11.5/20; owner's account review
GMU 2026 grey tier 2 (added) G10 A2.5 M2 O1.5 D0 P0.5 N0 I0.5 T0.5 = 7.5/20 (below 10: example of practice only); undated review
Evanko 2025 grey tier 2 (added) G12 A3.5 M4.5 O1.5 D1 P0.5 N1.5 I0.5 T0.5 = 13.5/20; owner's data review, state-of-the-art, position, baseline