Sources: the pool and its quality

27 sources: 23 read on 2026-11-02, and 4 added by a forward-citation pass on 2026-11-03. Method in protocol, terms in frame. Below 10 of 20, a grey source is an example of practice only.

Shape: sources

Flow

Stage Count
OpenAlex strings run 9
Title searches screened 5
Seminal works added by recall, verified 3
Forward citations screened (titles) 586 unique, 191 read on concept
Forward citations added (formal) 4
Included, formal 20
Included, grey (tiers 1 to 3) 4
Grey below the threshold, examples only 2

Formal

Key Kind Found via Grade Used in
Licklider 1960 formal recall convention frame, review
Parasuraman 2000 formal recall convention, widely adopted review, baseline
Dellermann 2019 formal string 2 convention (definition) frame, review
Akata 2020 formal string 2 convention (agenda) review, baseline
Seeber 2020 formal string 3 convention (agenda from 65 scientists) review
O'Neill 2020 formal string 4 supported with caveat (76 articles) review
Berretta 2023 formal string 3 supported with caveat (scoping review) review
Mosqueira-Rey 2022 formal string 5 convention (state of the art) review
Wu 2022b formal string 5 convention (survey) review
Shneiderman 2020 formal string 6 convention review
Amershi 2019 formal string 6 supported with caveat (49 design practitioners, 20 AI-infused products) review
Raisch 2021 formal string 7 convention (argument) against
Vaccaro 2024 formal string 6 measured against, state of the art
Noy 2023 formal string 6 measured state of the art
Zou 2025 formal title search convention (survey) review
Hassani 2020 formal string 7 convention review
Richardson 2025 formal forward from Parasuraman 2000 supported with caveat (systematic review of levels-of-automation critiques) review
González 2026 formal forward from Vaccaro 2024 and Akata 2020 convention (complementarity framework) review
Hemmer 2025 formal forward from Vaccaro 2024 convention (concept of complementarity; two empirical studies) review
Gómez 2025 formal forward from Vaccaro 2024 supported with caveat (systematic review, 105 articles, secondary) review, against

Grey

Score out of 20: authority 4, methodology 6, objectivity 4, date 1, position 1, novelty 2, impact 1, outlet 1.

Key Tier Score and subtotals Used in
Engelbart 1962 1, report 16: 4, 3, 3, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1 frame, review
Dell'Acqua 2023 1, working paper 18: 3.5, 5.5, 3, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1; measured against
Peng 2023 1, preprint 16: 3, 4.5, 3, 1, 1, 1.5, 1, 1; measured state of the art
Case 2018 1, essay 10.5: 3, 1, 2, 1, 0.5, 1.5, 1, 0.5 frame
Anthropic 2024 3, company blog 9: 3, 1.5, 1, 1, 0.5, 1, 1, 0; example of practice only review
Agentic AI Foundation 2026 3, convention site 6: 2, 0.5, 1.5, 0.5, 0, 0.5, 1, 0; example of practice only review
Garousi 2019 formal method of this review protocol