A first pass of 27 sources. It finds that the field's names are intelligence augmentation and hybrid intelligence, and that this family fits augmentation better than teaming.
Files
frame step 1: the problem and the field's names for it
protocol how the pool was built, and what was not searched
sources the flow, then each work with its grade or score
review step 2: surveys, seminal works, practice
state of the art step 3: best evidence beside the practice most adopted
position step 4: which field, and what the family adds
against where the combination fails
baseline step 5: the named baseline, H1
bibliography every work cited, once
Claims
The field's names are intelligence augmentation, hybrid intelligence, human-AI teaming and human-in-the-loop
convention, from surveys and definitions
frame.md
Human-AI combinations did worse than the best of either alone on average, g of -0.23 (secondary)
measured
against.md
A model raised output on writing and coding tasks inside its reach (secondary)
measured
state-of-the-art.md
The checking machine is not a third role in the literature read
supported with caveat: one reviewer, a small pool
position.md
Agent files and agent patterns are adopted without a controlled study
convention, untested
review.md