A participant's report is an experience report
Claim: a case written by those who took part names its genre, an experience report with repository measures, and the baseline it meets.
- Grade: convention.
- Evidence: Ralph 2020, Case Study standard (excludes the experience report from its scope); ICSE 2003, experience-report criteria; Runeson 2009. Where: frame; record 0002.
- Check:
case-genre(exact): the Genre and baseline say experience report and name Runeson 2009, in the case or in the earlier case it links. - Reader styles: none particular to this genre yet; the reader-ergonomics styles hold.
What it asks
- The Genre and baseline section says that the report is an experience report, and that it has a part drawn from repositories.
- It names the checklist it meets, the reader's checklist of Runeson 2009.
- A later case may take both from an earlier one by a link.
Why
- The community standard for case studies excludes reports by participants; calling one a case study claims a method it did not use.
- The genre sets what a reader may ask of it: a take-home message, both outcomes, the authors' roles.
Limits
- The field's name for the genre differs from this repository's. The repository keeps its name; the frame says how.
- No test shows that naming the genre makes a report more trusted.