No model analyses the data

Claim: a case states that no language model analysed its data; a model may draft the prose, which a person reads before it counts.

What it asks

  • The Analysis section says, in so many words, that no model analysed any data.
  • Counts come from a program or from a person; prose may be drafted by a model.
  • The maintainer reads the prose before it counts.

Why

  • A model reading a log may report what it expects; the counts are the evidence and must not pass through that filter.
  • The standard names the practice as an antipattern, and a case here is written by a model's sessions about their own day.

Limits

  • The check sees the statement, not the practice; only a person can tell whether the statement is true.
  • The antipattern is a convention of a standards committee, not a measured effect.